Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1164220040160020043
Journal of Korean Society for Radiotherapeutic Technology
2004 Volume.16 No. 2 p.43 ~ p.61
Customer Acceptance Procedure for Clinac (21EX-Platinum)
Hong Dong-Ki

Lee Woo-Seok
Kwon Kyung-Tae
Park Kwang-Ho
Kim Jeong-Man
Abstract
Purpose : For qualify improvement in radiotherapy, it is important to set up and evaluate equipment (linac) accurately. In addition, technicians are needed to be fully aware of the equipment¡¯s detailed quality and its manual. Therefore, the result of ATP is evaluated and introduced, in order that the technicians are skilled by participating in quality assurance (QA) and understanding the quality of the equipment before clinical use.

Method and Material : QA for LINAC 21EX (Varian, US) was done with suppliers its procedure was divided into radiation survey, mechanical test, radiation isocenter test, bean performance, dosimetry, and enhanced dynamic wedge and using X-omat film (Kodak), multidata, densitometer, and electrometer. QA of MLC (Millennium, 120 leaf) attached to LINAC and EPID (Portal vision) were done separately.

Result : The leakage dose by survey meter was below the tolerance. In mechanical test, collimater, gantry, and couch rotation were less than 1mm, and the angles were for digital and for mechanical. The alignment test of the light field and crosshair were evaluated less than 1mm. The (a)symmetrical jaw field was less than . The radiation isocenter test using X-mat film was less than 1mm. The consistency of light field and radiation field was less than . PDD for photon energy was less than and for electron energy of were evaluated within the tolerance. Flatness for photon and electron energy was evaluated (tolerance ) and (tolerance ), respectively, and symmetry was (tolerance ) and (tolerance ), respectively. Dosimetry test for short term, MU setting, rep rate, and dose rate accuracy of photon and electron energy was within the tolerance depending on energy, MU, and gantry angle.

Conclusion : Accuracy and safety for clinical use of Clinac 21EX was verified through customer acceptance procedure and the quality of the equipment was found out. These can reduce the difficulties in using the equipment. Furthermore, it is useful for clinically treatment of patients by technicians¡¯ active participations.
KEYWORD
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information